2 comments on “Mt Buffalo chalet rescue plan rejected

  1. The consortium’s plan was over the top and relied almost entirely on government funding. The bottom line is that this consortium was being opportunistic, hoping to gain approval without putting any of their own money in to speak of apart from the $250,000 contribution to the viability study & business plan, which equates to about $15,000 per shareholder. Not a bad bet if it yields you a $50 million asset! Fortunately the government saw through it and said “no”. I live in Bright and I think the fuss being made about reopening the Chalet for accommodation purposes is primarily romantic nonsense. It’s past it’s use-by-date and has never been a viable enterprise anyway. Of course we should preserve the building but all that’s required is a few million from the State Govt to ‘tidy it up’ and then let out the cafe & bar to service daytrippers.

  2. Ray, Unfortunately your view are both short and narrow minded. Business models can be taken from other alpine regions to promote a year round tourism industry (rather than the traditional winter ski / snow season)

    Mt Buller has shown that summer can also be economically viable in alpine regions by allowing targa style car races, mountain bike riding etc.

    And as stated on the DPCD website… “Departments and agencies are ultimately responsible for the ongoing care and conservation of assets owned, occupied or managed by the State.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s